Deprivation Statistics Comparison for Gipping, Ipswich

English Indices of Deprivation statistical comparisons for Lower-Super Output Areas in Gipping, Ipswich, Suffolk

We have used the 5 English index of deprivation statistics Lower-Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Gipping, to provide you with an at-a-glace overview of deprivation in this area of Ipswich. We have combined these statitics into an English ward level, as most people are familiar with this geospacial area in their town or city. Here are those 5 marked on a map:

Each area has its own decile score. This is where each LSOA in England is ranked according to the level of deprivation and split into 10 equal groups. A decile score of 1 means the area is in the top 10% of deprived areas, 2 is equal to the top 20% and so forth. To simply these scores and apply them to a ward, we have created the iLiveHere rating. This takes the average decile score of all the LSOAs in a ward and converts that into a rating out of 10, where 1 is the best and 10 is the worst. We have then used to traffic light colour system as an at-a-glance reference. As you scroll down this page, the more red ratings you see, the more deprived Gipping is. Indices of Deprivation statistics and are broken down into domains of deprivation or more simply, categories. These category scores are combined using a percentage weighting to give a an LSOA its final indices of deprivation score, decile and rank:

  • Income Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Employment Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Education, Skills and Training Deprivation (13.5%)
  • Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)
  • Crime (9.3%)
  • Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)
  • Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%)
Below we have split the Living Environment Deprivation category into its sub-categories. We think having individual iLiveHere ratings for Inside Environment and Outside Environment provides a better insight to the housing quality and outside space in Gipping. However, the Living Environment Deprivation decile is used for the overall ward iLiveHere rating.

How grim is your Postcode?

Overall Deprivation in Gipping

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
Taking into consideration all the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) domains, this is our overall iLiveHere rating for Gipping. It is certainly something you should take into account if you are thinking of moving to this area of Ipswich.
LSOA Name IMD Score IMD Rank (England) IMD Decile
Ipswich 010C 44.011 3252/32,844 1
Ipswich 010D 40.703 4055/32,844 2
Ipswich 010E 39.168 4516/32,844 2
Ipswich 010A 30.575 7756/32,844 3
Ipswich 010B 27.238 9445/32,844 3

Income Deprivation in Gipping

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what proportion of the population are experiencing deprivation relating to low income in Gipping. The definition of low income the government uses to compile these statistics includes those who are out-of-work (for any reason, not just unemployment) and those that are in work but satisfy the IMD means tests. In the real world, this means they may qualify for means tested benefits such as Universal Credit or legacy benefits such as Working Tax Credits. You should not to assume that this rating is an indicator of overall poverty in this ward.
LSOA Name Income Score Income Rank (England) Income Decile
Ipswich 010C 0.264 3446/32,844 2
Ipswich 010D 0.243 4357/32,844 2
Ipswich 010E 0.211 6046/32,844 2
Ipswich 010A 0.17 8793/32,844 3
Ipswich 010B 0.128 12716/32,844 4

Employment Deprivation in Gipping

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is an iundicator of the proportion of working-age residents in Gipping who are excluded from the jobs market. These are people who are involuntarily deprived of work. The IMD domains include people who are unemployment, those who are sick or disabled, and carers. Since the government no longer publishes percentage figures for unemployment after the introduction of Universal Credit, his is now the only reliable indictor of joblessness in this ward. The higher the iLiveHere rating, the harder it could be to get work.
LSOA Name Employment Score Employment Rank (England) Employment Decile
Ipswich 010C 0.202 3014/32,844 1
Ipswich 010D 0.175 4612/32,844 2
Ipswich 010E 0.163 5524/32,844 2
Ipswich 010A 0.133 8125/32,844 3
Ipswich 010B 0.113 10551/32,844 4

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation in Gipping

9
Very Bad
iLivehere Rating 9/10
This iLiveHere rating ia an indicator of the lack of formal qualification and job-based skills in the Gipping population. The average Education, Skill and Training rank for children (3152/32,844) in Gipping is less than the adult average rank (5096/32,844). It could be argued that the more educated adults move into the area.
LSOA Name Education Score Education Rank (England) Education Decile
Ipswich 010D 63.448 1347/32,844 1
Ipswich 010C 57.768 2010/32,844 1
Ipswich 010E 44.868 4193/32,844 2
Ipswich 010A 43.555 4515/32,844 2
Ipswich 010B 36.442 6314/32,844 2

Health Deprivation and Disability in Gipping

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is indictor of the risk of dying prematurely or having your quality of life impaired through poor physical or mental health in Gipping. The IMD domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality. However, it does not take into consideration but personal behaviour or environmental factors that may be predictive of future health problems. See Outdoor Deprivation for depivation that includes environmental factors such as local pullution levels.
LSOA Name Health Score Health Rank (England) Health Decile
Ipswich 010D 1.122 3363/32,844 2
Ipswich 010E 0.936 4728/32,844 2
Ipswich 010C 0.849 5459/32,844 2
Ipswich 010A 0.712 6755/32,844 3
Ipswich 010B 0.143 13835/32,844 5

Crime Deprivation in Gipping

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indictor of how likely you are to be a victim of personal and material crime in Gipping. In policing statistics, this is known as 'street level crime' and includes offences such as robbery, burglary and other personal violent crime.
LSOA Name Crime Score Crime Rank (England) Crime Decile
Ipswich 010C 1.095 2838/32,844 1
Ipswich 010B 0.673 6811/32,844 3
Ipswich 010D 0.456 9677/32,844 3
Ipswich 010A 0.438 9934/32,844 4
Ipswich 010E 0.305 11863/32,844 4

There were 503 street level crime incidents in the Policing neighbourhood that covers Gipping in February 2024

Barriers to Housing and Services in Gipping

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating measures the financial accessibility and physical accessibility to housing and local services in Gipping. I bad rating in an urban area indicates how unaffordable the housing could be. A bad rating in a rural area is an indicator of the absense of local services.
LSOA Name Barriers Score Barriers Rank (England) Barriers Decile
Ipswich 010B 34.444 4342/32,844 2
Ipswich 010E 31.283 6097/32,844 2
Ipswich 010A 28.295 8192/32,844 3
Ipswich 010C 22.771 13442/32,844 5
Ipswich 010D 17.037 20391/32,844 7

Inside Environment Deprivation in Gipping

6
Average
iLivehere Rating 6/10
This iLivehHere rating is an indicator of the quality of housing in Gipping. A bad rating in an equally income deprived ward, could be because of poorly maintained rented accomodation. A bad rating in a non income deprived area, could be because the small size of housing in relation to costs.
LSOA Name Inside Score Inside Rank (England) Inside Decile
Ipswich 010E 1.167 2653/32,844 1
Ipswich 010D 0.402 10503/32,844 4
Ipswich 010B 0.371 10916/32,844 4
Ipswich 010C -0.114 18262/32,844 6
Ipswich 010A -0.126 18448/32,844 6

Outside Environment Deprivation in Gipping

4
Above Average
iLivehere Rating 4/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what the outdoors environment is like in Gipping. The IMD domains measure the air quality and the rate of road traffic accidents in each LSOA.
LSOA Name Outside Score Outside (England) Outside Decile
Ipswich 010B -0.186 18408/32,844 6
Ipswich 010E -0.241 19325/32,844 6
Ipswich 010A -0.357 21302/32,844 7
Ipswich 010C -0.428 22457/32,844 7
Ipswich 010D -0.627 25264/32,844 8

Disclaimer: Although every care has been taken to make sure there are no mistakes in the data presented on this page, you should verify these figures with the official data source.