Deprivation Statistics for Mortlake and Barnes Common, Richmond upon Thames

English Indices of Deprivation statistical comparisons for Lower-Super Output Areas in Mortlake and Barnes Common, Richmond upon Thames, Greater London

We have used the 7 English index of deprivation statistics Lower-Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Mortlake and Barnes Common, to provide you with an at-a-glace overview of deprivation in this area of Richmond upon Thames. We have combined these statitics into an English ward level, as most people are familiar with this geospacial area in their town or city. Here are those 7 marked on a map:

Each area has its own decile score. This is where each LSOA in England is ranked according to the level of deprivation and split into 10 equal groups. A decile score of 1 means the area is in the top 10% of deprived areas, 2 is equal to the top 20% and so forth. To simply these scores and apply them to a ward, we have created the iLiveHere rating. This takes the average decile score of all the LSOAs in a ward and converts that into a rating out of 10, where 1 is the best and 10 is the worst. We have then used to traffic light colour system as an at-a-glance reference. As you scroll down this page, the more red ratings you see, the more deprived Mortlake and Barnes Common is. Indices of Deprivation statistics and are broken down into domains of deprivation or more simply, categories. These category scores are combined using a percentage weighting to give a an LSOA its final indices of deprivation score, decile and rank:

  • Income Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Employment Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Education, Skills and Training Deprivation (13.5%)
  • Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)
  • Crime (9.3%)
  • Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)
  • Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%)
Below we have split the Living Environment Deprivation category into its sub-categories. We think having individual iLiveHere ratings for Inside Environment and Outside Environment provides a better insight to the housing quality and outside space in Mortlake and Barnes Common. However, the Living Environment Deprivation decile is used for the overall ward iLiveHere rating.

How grim is your Postcode?

Overall Deprivation in Mortlake and Barnes Common

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
Taking into consideration all the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) domains, this is our overall iLiveHere rating for Mortlake and Barnes Common. It is certainly something you should take into account if you are thinking of moving to this area of Richmond upon Thames.
LSOA Name IMD Score IMD Rank (England) IMD Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003D 19.172 15099/32,844 5
Richmond upon Thames 003A 13.631 20334/32,844 7
Richmond upon Thames 003B 11.466 22779/32,844 7
Richmond upon Thames 003C 7.824 27287/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003E 6.295 29104/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003F 5.533 29987/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003G 3.877 31608/32,844 10

Income Deprivation in Mortlake and Barnes Common

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what proportion of the population are experiencing deprivation relating to low income in Mortlake and Barnes Common. The definition of low income the government uses to compile these statistics includes those who are out-of-work (for any reason, not just unemployment) and those that are in work but satisfy the IMD means tests. In the real world, this means they may qualify for means tested benefits such as Universal Credit or legacy benefits such as Working Tax Credits. You should not to assume that this rating is an indicator of overall poverty in this ward.
LSOA Name Income Score Income Rank (England) Income Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003D 0.16 9640/32,844 3
Richmond upon Thames 003B 0.084 18833/32,844 6
Richmond upon Thames 003A 0.075 20417/32,844 7
Richmond upon Thames 003E 0.063 23125/32,844 8
Richmond upon Thames 003C 0.052 25596/32,844 8
Richmond upon Thames 003F 0.048 26658/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003G 0.024 31705/32,844 10

Employment Deprivation in Mortlake and Barnes Common

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating is an iundicator of the proportion of working-age residents in Mortlake and Barnes Common who are excluded from the jobs market. These are people who are involuntarily deprived of work. The IMD domains include people who are unemployment, those who are sick or disabled, and carers. Since the government no longer publishes percentage figures for unemployment after the introduction of Universal Credit, his is now the only reliable indictor of joblessness in this ward. The higher the iLiveHere rating, the harder it could be to get work.
LSOA Name Employment Score Employment Rank (England) Employment Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003D 0.109 11171/32,844 4
Richmond upon Thames 003B 0.076 17354/32,844 6
Richmond upon Thames 003A 0.049 25127/32,844 8
Richmond upon Thames 003C 0.041 27496/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003E 0.038 28435/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003F 0.038 28547/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003G 0.018 32383/32,844 10

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation in Mortlake and Barnes Common

1
Excellent
iLivehere Rating 1/10
This iLiveHere rating ia an indicator of the lack of formal qualification and job-based skills in the Mortlake and Barnes Common population. The average Education, Skill and Training rank for children (26588/32,844) in Mortlake and Barnes Common is less than the adult average rank (31237/32,844). It could be argued that the more educated adults move into the area.
LSOA Name Education Score Education Rank (England) Education Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003D 11.254 20666/32,844 7
Richmond upon Thames 003B 3.677 28908/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003F 3.103 29612/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003C 3.008 29731/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003E 1.272 31709/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003A 0.508 32513/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003G 0.162 32785/32,844 10

Health Deprivation and Disability in Mortlake and Barnes Common

1
Excellent
iLivehere Rating 1/10
This iLiveHere rating is indictor of the risk of dying prematurely or having your quality of life impaired through poor physical or mental health in Mortlake and Barnes Common. The IMD domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality. However, it does not take into consideration but personal behaviour or environmental factors that may be predictive of future health problems. See Outdoor Deprivation for depivation that includes environmental factors such as local pullution levels.
LSOA Name Health Score Health Rank (England) Health Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003D -0.661 25481/32,844 8
Richmond upon Thames 003B -1.067 29348/32,844 9
Richmond upon Thames 003A -1.347 31099/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003E -1.553 31853/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003G -1.562 31888/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003C -1.623 32045/32,844 10
Richmond upon Thames 003F -1.808 32391/32,844 10

Crime Deprivation in Mortlake and Barnes Common

5
Average
iLivehere Rating 5/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indictor of how likely you are to be a victim of personal and material crime in Mortlake and Barnes Common. In policing statistics, this is known as 'street level crime' and includes offences such as robbery, burglary and other personal violent crime.
LSOA Name Crime Score Crime Rank (England) Crime Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003A 1.043 3200/32,844 1
Richmond upon Thames 003C 0.404 10380/32,844 4
Richmond upon Thames 003D 0.204 13429/32,844 5
Richmond upon Thames 003B 0.075 15506/32,844 5
Richmond upon Thames 003E -0.41 22570/32,844 7
Richmond upon Thames 003G -0.424 22759/32,844 7
Richmond upon Thames 003F -0.526 24128/32,844 8

There were 0 street level crime incidents in the Policing neighbourhood that covers Mortlake and Barnes Common in February 2024

Barriers to Housing and Services in Mortlake and Barnes Common

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating measures the financial accessibility and physical accessibility to housing and local services in Mortlake and Barnes Common. I bad rating in an urban area indicates how unaffordable the housing could be. A bad rating in a rural area is an indicator of the absense of local services.
LSOA Name Barriers Score Barriers Rank (England) Barriers Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003D 22.147 14158/32,844 5
Richmond upon Thames 003A 20.394 16189/32,844 5
Richmond upon Thames 003B 16.705 20809/32,844 7
Richmond upon Thames 003E 14.293 23887/32,844 8
Richmond upon Thames 003C 14.14 24060/32,844 8
Richmond upon Thames 003F 13.623 24665/32,844 8
Richmond upon Thames 003G 7.909 30396/32,844 10

Inside Environment Deprivation in Mortlake and Barnes Common

5
Average
iLivehere Rating 5/10
This iLivehHere rating is an indicator of the quality of housing in Mortlake and Barnes Common. A bad rating in an equally income deprived ward, could be because of poorly maintained rented accomodation. A bad rating in a non income deprived area, could be because the small size of housing in relation to costs.
LSOA Name Inside Score Inside Rank (England) Inside Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003G 0.221 13003/32,844 4
Richmond upon Thames 003E -0.039 17059/32,844 6
Richmond upon Thames 003F -0.073 17610/32,844 6
Richmond upon Thames 003B -0.076 17666/32,844 6
Richmond upon Thames 003A -0.155 18924/32,844 6
Richmond upon Thames 003C -0.189 19456/32,844 6
Richmond upon Thames 003D -0.491 23790/32,844 8

Outside Environment Deprivation in Mortlake and Barnes Common

9
Very Bad
iLivehere Rating 9/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what the outdoors environment is like in Mortlake and Barnes Common. The IMD domains measure the air quality and the rate of road traffic accidents in each LSOA.
LSOA Name Outside Score Outside (England) Outside Decile
Richmond upon Thames 003A 1.88 607/32,844 1
Richmond upon Thames 003C 1.209 2898/32,844 1
Richmond upon Thames 003D 1.075 3633/32,844 2
Richmond upon Thames 003F 1.029 3939/32,844 2
Richmond upon Thames 003B 1.021 3993/32,844 2
Richmond upon Thames 003G 0.976 4314/32,844 2
Richmond upon Thames 003E 0.965 4394/32,844 2

Disclaimer: Although every care has been taken to make sure there are no mistakes in the data presented on this page, you should verify these figures with the official data source.