Deprivation Statistics Comparison for Cranleigh East, Waverley

English Indices of Deprivation statistical comparisons for Lower-Super Output Areas in Cranleigh East, Waverley, Surrey

We have used the 4 English index of deprivation statistics Lower-Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Cranleigh East, to provide you with an at-a-glace overview of deprivation in this area of Waverley. We have combined these statitics into an English ward level, as most people are familiar with this geospacial area in their town or city. Here are those 4 marked on a map:

Each area has its own decile score. This is where each LSOA in England is ranked according to the level of deprivation and split into 10 equal groups. A decile score of 1 means the area is in the top 10% of deprived areas, 2 is equal to the top 20% and so forth. To simply these scores and apply them to a ward, we have created the iLiveHere rating. This takes the average decile score of all the LSOAs in a ward and converts that into a rating out of 10, where 1 is the best and 10 is the worst. We have then used to traffic light colour system as an at-a-glance reference. As you scroll down this page, the more red ratings you see, the more deprived Cranleigh East is. Indices of Deprivation statistics and are broken down into domains of deprivation or more simply, categories. These category scores are combined using a percentage weighting to give a an LSOA its final indices of deprivation score, decile and rank:

  • Income Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Employment Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Education, Skills and Training Deprivation (13.5%)
  • Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)
  • Crime (9.3%)
  • Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)
  • Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%)
Below we have split the Living Environment Deprivation category into its sub-categories. We think having individual iLiveHere ratings for Inside Environment and Outside Environment provides a better insight to the housing quality and outside space in Cranleigh East. However, the Living Environment Deprivation decile is used for the overall ward iLiveHere rating.

How grim is your Postcode?

Overall Deprivation in Cranleigh East

1
Excellent
iLivehere Rating 1/10
Taking into consideration all the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) domains, this is our overall iLiveHere rating for Cranleigh East. It is certainly something you should take into account if you are thinking of moving to this area of Waverley.
LSOA Name IMD Score IMD Rank (England) IMD Decile
Waverley 013C 13.108 20940/32,844 7
Waverley 013B 5.264 30256/32,844 10
Waverley 013D 4.11 31396/32,844 10
Waverley 013A 3.095 32173/32,844 10

Income Deprivation in Cranleigh East

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what proportion of the population are experiencing deprivation relating to low income in Cranleigh East. The definition of low income the government uses to compile these statistics includes those who are out-of-work (for any reason, not just unemployment) and those that are in work but satisfy the IMD means tests. In the real world, this means they may qualify for means tested benefits such as Universal Credit or legacy benefits such as Working Tax Credits. You should not to assume that this rating is an indicator of overall poverty in this ward.
LSOA Name Income Score Income Rank (England) Income Decile
Waverley 013C 0.094 17207/32,844 6
Waverley 013B 0.056 24736/32,844 8
Waverley 013D 0.055 25040/32,844 8
Waverley 013A 0.019 32301/32,844 10

Employment Deprivation in Cranleigh East

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating is an iundicator of the proportion of working-age residents in Cranleigh East who are excluded from the jobs market. These are people who are involuntarily deprived of work. The IMD domains include people who are unemployment, those who are sick or disabled, and carers. Since the government no longer publishes percentage figures for unemployment after the introduction of Universal Credit, his is now the only reliable indictor of joblessness in this ward. The higher the iLiveHere rating, the harder it could be to get work.
LSOA Name Employment Score Employment Rank (England) Employment Decile
Waverley 013C 0.082 15814/32,844 5
Waverley 013B 0.049 24926/32,844 8
Waverley 013D 0.04 27991/32,844 9
Waverley 013A 0.032 30141/32,844 10

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation in Cranleigh East

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating ia an indicator of the lack of formal qualification and job-based skills in the Cranleigh East population. The average Education, Skill and Training rank for children (21612/32,844) in Cranleigh East is less than the adult average rank (23078/32,844). It could be argued that the more educated adults move into the area.
LSOA Name Education Score Education Rank (England) Education Decile
Waverley 013C 24.489 11087/32,844 4
Waverley 013B 8.852 23021/32,844 8
Waverley 013D 4.314 28146/32,844 9
Waverley 013A 3.287 29398/32,844 9

Health Deprivation and Disability in Cranleigh East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLiveHere rating is indictor of the risk of dying prematurely or having your quality of life impaired through poor physical or mental health in Cranleigh East. The IMD domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality. However, it does not take into consideration but personal behaviour or environmental factors that may be predictive of future health problems. See Outdoor Deprivation for depivation that includes environmental factors such as local pullution levels.
LSOA Name Health Score Health Rank (England) Health Decile
Waverley 013C -0.138 18190/32,844 6
Waverley 013B -1.042 29148/32,844 9
Waverley 013A -1.155 29981/32,844 10
Waverley 013D -1.177 30151/32,844 10

Crime Deprivation in Cranleigh East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indictor of how likely you are to be a victim of personal and material crime in Cranleigh East. In policing statistics, this is known as 'street level crime' and includes offences such as robbery, burglary and other personal violent crime.
LSOA Name Crime Score Crime Rank (England) Crime Decile
Waverley 013C -0.678 25973/32,844 8
Waverley 013D -0.699 26211/32,844 8
Waverley 013B -1.146 30137/32,844 10
Waverley 013A -1.745 32364/32,844 10

There were 25 street level crime incidents in the Policing neighbourhood that covers Cranleigh East in March 2024

Barriers to Housing and Services in Cranleigh East

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating measures the financial accessibility and physical accessibility to housing and local services in Cranleigh East. I bad rating in an urban area indicates how unaffordable the housing could be. A bad rating in a rural area is an indicator of the absense of local services.
LSOA Name Barriers Score Barriers Rank (England) Barriers Decile
Waverley 013A 22.749 13477/32,844 5
Waverley 013B 12.562 25934/32,844 8
Waverley 013C 11.657 26951/32,844 9
Waverley 013D 9.893 28694/32,844 9

Inside Environment Deprivation in Cranleigh East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLivehHere rating is an indicator of the quality of housing in Cranleigh East. A bad rating in an equally income deprived ward, could be because of poorly maintained rented accomodation. A bad rating in a non income deprived area, could be because the small size of housing in relation to costs.
LSOA Name Inside Score Inside Rank (England) Inside Decile
Waverley 013D -0.422 22853/32,844 7
Waverley 013B -0.494 23850/32,844 8
Waverley 013C -1.284 30707/32,844 10
Waverley 013A -1.463 31402/32,844 10

Outside Environment Deprivation in Cranleigh East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what the outdoors environment is like in Cranleigh East. The IMD domains measure the air quality and the rate of road traffic accidents in each LSOA.
LSOA Name Outside Score Outside (England) Outside Decile
Waverley 013C -0.656 25617/32,844 8
Waverley 013D -0.679 25913/32,844 8
Waverley 013A -0.812 27537/32,844 9
Waverley 013B -1.055 29889/32,844 10

Disclaimer: Although every care has been taken to make sure there are no mistakes in the data presented on this page, you should verify these figures with the official data source.