Deprivation Statistics for Shepherd’s Bush Green, Hammersmith and Fulham

English Indices of Deprivation statistical comparisons for Lower-Super Output Areas in Shepherd's Bush Green, Hammersmith and Fulham, Greater London

We have used the 7 English index of deprivation statistics Lower-Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Shepherd's Bush Green, to provide you with an at-a-glace overview of deprivation in this area of Hammersmith and Fulham. We have combined these statitics into an English ward level, as most people are familiar with this geospacial area in their town or city. Here are those 7 marked on a map:

Each area has its own decile score. This is where each LSOA in England is ranked according to the level of deprivation and split into 10 equal groups. A decile score of 1 means the area is in the top 10% of deprived areas, 2 is equal to the top 20% and so forth. To simply these scores and apply them to a ward, we have created the iLiveHere rating. This takes the average decile score of all the LSOAs in a ward and converts that into a rating out of 10, where 1 is the best and 10 is the worst. We have then used to traffic light colour system as an at-a-glance reference. As you scroll down this page, the more red ratings you see, the more deprived Shepherd's Bush Green is. Indices of Deprivation statistics and are broken down into domains of deprivation or more simply, categories. These category scores are combined using a percentage weighting to give a an LSOA its final indices of deprivation score, decile and rank:

  • Income Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Employment Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Education, Skills and Training Deprivation (13.5%)
  • Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)
  • Crime (9.3%)
  • Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)
  • Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%)
Below we have split the Living Environment Deprivation category into its sub-categories. We think having individual iLiveHere ratings for Inside Environment and Outside Environment provides a better insight to the housing quality and outside space in Shepherd's Bush Green. However, the Living Environment Deprivation decile is used for the overall ward iLiveHere rating.

How grim is your Postcode?

Overall Deprivation in Shepherd's Bush Green

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
Taking into consideration all the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) domains, this is our overall iLiveHere rating for Shepherd's Bush Green. It is certainly something you should take into account if you are thinking of moving to this area of Hammersmith and Fulham.
LSOA Name IMD Score IMD Rank (England) IMD Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B 43.021 3478/32,844 2
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 34.773 5966/32,844 2
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 33.034 6650/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 30.224 7925/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 25.101 10706/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 24.159 11283/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D 21.955 12811/32,844 4

Income Deprivation in Shepherd's Bush Green

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what proportion of the population are experiencing deprivation relating to low income in Shepherd's Bush Green. The definition of low income the government uses to compile these statistics includes those who are out-of-work (for any reason, not just unemployment) and those that are in work but satisfy the IMD means tests. In the real world, this means they may qualify for means tested benefits such as Universal Credit or legacy benefits such as Working Tax Credits. You should not to assume that this rating is an indicator of overall poverty in this ward.
LSOA Name Income Score Income Rank (England) Income Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B 0.304 2074/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 0.225 5247/32,844 2
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 0.167 9040/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D 0.164 9263/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 0.162 9442/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 0.155 10058/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 0.142 11226/32,844 4

Employment Deprivation in Shepherd's Bush Green

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating is an iundicator of the proportion of working-age residents in Shepherd's Bush Green who are excluded from the jobs market. These are people who are involuntarily deprived of work. The IMD domains include people who are unemployment, those who are sick or disabled, and carers. Since the government no longer publishes percentage figures for unemployment after the introduction of Universal Credit, his is now the only reliable indictor of joblessness in this ward. The higher the iLiveHere rating, the harder it could be to get work.
LSOA Name Employment Score Employment Rank (England) Employment Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B 0.232 1823/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 0.138 7710/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 0.135 8011/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 0.12 9741/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D 0.118 9947/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 0.115 10299/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 0.11 11017/32,844 4

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation in Shepherd's Bush Green

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating ia an indicator of the lack of formal qualification and job-based skills in the Shepherd's Bush Green population. The average Education, Skill and Training rank for children (20075/32,844) in Shepherd's Bush Green is less than the adult average rank (27065/32,844). It could be argued that the more educated adults move into the area.
LSOA Name Education Score Education Rank (England) Education Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B 14.852 17460/32,844 6
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 13.225 18852/32,844 6
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D 9.743 22106/32,844 7
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 5.903 26267/32,844 8
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 5.702 26495/32,844 9
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 5.672 26531/32,844 9
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 3.312 29364/32,844 9

Health Deprivation and Disability in Shepherd's Bush Green

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating is indictor of the risk of dying prematurely or having your quality of life impaired through poor physical or mental health in Shepherd's Bush Green. The IMD domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality. However, it does not take into consideration but personal behaviour or environmental factors that may be predictive of future health problems. See Outdoor Deprivation for depivation that includes environmental factors such as local pullution levels.
LSOA Name Health Score Health Rank (England) Health Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 0.643 7460/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B 0.624 7667/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 0.572 8269/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 0.373 10684/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D 0.337 11125/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 0.248 12375/32,844 4
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 0.113 14324/32,844 5

Crime Deprivation in Shepherd's Bush Green

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indictor of how likely you are to be a victim of personal and material crime in Shepherd's Bush Green. In policing statistics, this is known as 'street level crime' and includes offences such as robbery, burglary and other personal violent crime.
LSOA Name Crime Score Crime Rank (England) Crime Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 1.387 1401/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 1.049 3145/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 0.856 4838/32,844 2
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 0.803 5382/32,844 2
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 0.706 6450/32,844 2
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B -0.222 19930/32,844 7
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D -1.041 29429/32,844 9

There were 1286 street level crime incidents in the Policing neighbourhood that covers Shepherd's Bush Green in January 2024

Barriers to Housing and Services in Shepherd's Bush Green

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating measures the financial accessibility and physical accessibility to housing and local services in Shepherd's Bush Green. I bad rating in an urban area indicates how unaffordable the housing could be. A bad rating in a rural area is an indicator of the absense of local services.
LSOA Name Barriers Score Barriers Rank (England) Barriers Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B 42.535 1532/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 37.191 3135/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 36.984 3204/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 32.383 5437/32,844 2
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D 29.839 7074/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 27.654 8717/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 25.909 10252/32,844 4

Inside Environment Deprivation in Shepherd's Bush Green

4
Above Average
iLivehere Rating 4/10
This iLivehHere rating is an indicator of the quality of housing in Shepherd's Bush Green. A bad rating in an equally income deprived ward, could be because of poorly maintained rented accomodation. A bad rating in a non income deprived area, could be because the small size of housing in relation to costs.
LSOA Name Inside Score Inside Rank (England) Inside Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 0.519 8918/32,844 3
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 0.027 16029/32,844 5
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C -0.054 17326/32,844 6
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C -0.068 17548/32,844 6
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B -0.151 18866/32,844 6
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D -0.752 26858/32,844 9
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B -0.909 28272/32,844 9

Outside Environment Deprivation in Shepherd's Bush Green

10
Extremely Bad
iLivehere Rating 10/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what the outdoors environment is like in Shepherd's Bush Green. The IMD domains measure the air quality and the rate of road traffic accidents in each LSOA.
LSOA Name Outside Score Outside (England) Outside Decile
Hammersmith and Fulham 005C 2.277 112/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 004A 2.115 258/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 004C 1.938 505/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005D 1.706 1000/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 004B 1.689 1042/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 005B 1.65 1156/32,844 1
Hammersmith and Fulham 004D 1.168 3104/32,844 1

Disclaimer: Although every care has been taken to make sure there are no mistakes in the data presented on this page, you should verify these figures with the official data source.