Deprivation Statistics Comparison for Bingham East, Rushcliffe

English Indices of Deprivation statistical comparisons for Lower-Super Output Areas in Bingham East, Rushcliffe, Nottinghamshire

We have used the 4 English index of deprivation statistics Lower-Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Bingham East, to provide you with an at-a-glace overview of deprivation in this area of Rushcliffe. We have combined these statitics into an English ward level, as most people are familiar with this geospacial area in their town or city. Here are those 4 marked on a map:

Each area has its own decile score. This is where each LSOA in England is ranked according to the level of deprivation and split into 10 equal groups. A decile score of 1 means the area is in the top 10% of deprived areas, 2 is equal to the top 20% and so forth. To simply these scores and apply them to a ward, we have created the iLiveHere rating. This takes the average decile score of all the LSOAs in a ward and converts that into a rating out of 10, where 1 is the best and 10 is the worst. We have then used to traffic light colour system as an at-a-glance reference. As you scroll down this page, the more red ratings you see, the more deprived Bingham East is. Indices of Deprivation statistics and are broken down into domains of deprivation or more simply, categories. These category scores are combined using a percentage weighting to give a an LSOA its final indices of deprivation score, decile and rank:

  • Income Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Employment Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Education, Skills and Training Deprivation (13.5%)
  • Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)
  • Crime (9.3%)
  • Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)
  • Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%)
Below we have split the Living Environment Deprivation category into its sub-categories. We think having individual iLiveHere ratings for Inside Environment and Outside Environment provides a better insight to the housing quality and outside space in Bingham East. However, the Living Environment Deprivation decile is used for the overall ward iLiveHere rating.

How grim is your Postcode?

Overall Deprivation in Bingham East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
Taking into consideration all the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) domains, this is our overall iLiveHere rating for Bingham East. It is certainly something you should take into account if you are thinking of moving to this area of Rushcliffe.
LSOA Name IMD Score IMD Rank (England) IMD Decile
Rushcliffe 002F 19.422 14892/32,844 5
Rushcliffe 002B 8.877 25953/32,844 8
Rushcliffe 002A 2.802 32335/32,844 10
Rushcliffe 002C 2.294 32573/32,844 10

Income Deprivation in Bingham East

4
Above Average
iLivehere Rating 4/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what proportion of the population are experiencing deprivation relating to low income in Bingham East. The definition of low income the government uses to compile these statistics includes those who are out-of-work (for any reason, not just unemployment) and those that are in work but satisfy the IMD means tests. In the real world, this means they may qualify for means tested benefits such as Universal Credit or legacy benefits such as Working Tax Credits. You should not to assume that this rating is an indicator of overall poverty in this ward.
LSOA Name Income Score Income Rank (England) Income Decile
Rushcliffe 002F 0.166 9118/32,844 3
Rushcliffe 002B 0.091 17809/32,844 6
Rushcliffe 002C 0.039 28787/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002A 0.032 30488/32,844 10

Employment Deprivation in Bingham East

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating is an iundicator of the proportion of working-age residents in Bingham East who are excluded from the jobs market. These are people who are involuntarily deprived of work. The IMD domains include people who are unemployment, those who are sick or disabled, and carers. Since the government no longer publishes percentage figures for unemployment after the introduction of Universal Credit, his is now the only reliable indictor of joblessness in this ward. The higher the iLiveHere rating, the harder it could be to get work.
LSOA Name Employment Score Employment Rank (England) Employment Decile
Rushcliffe 002F 0.111 10841/32,844 4
Rushcliffe 002B 0.075 17483/32,844 6
Rushcliffe 002C 0.033 29844/32,844 10
Rushcliffe 002A 0.029 30879/32,844 10

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation in Bingham East

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating ia an indicator of the lack of formal qualification and job-based skills in the Bingham East population. The average Education, Skill and Training rank for children (23883/32,844) in Bingham East is more than the adult average rank (21852/32,844). It could be argued that the more educated children leave the area.
LSOA Name Education Score Education Rank (England) Education Decile
Rushcliffe 002F 34.37 6987/32,844 3
Rushcliffe 002B 5.434 26796/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002A 3.783 28783/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002C 1.688 31225/32,844 10

Health Deprivation and Disability in Bingham East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLiveHere rating is indictor of the risk of dying prematurely or having your quality of life impaired through poor physical or mental health in Bingham East. The IMD domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality. However, it does not take into consideration but personal behaviour or environmental factors that may be predictive of future health problems. See Outdoor Deprivation for depivation that includes environmental factors such as local pullution levels.
LSOA Name Health Score Health Rank (England) Health Decile
Rushcliffe 002F -0.25 19869/32,844 7
Rushcliffe 002B -0.504 23466/32,844 8
Rushcliffe 002A -1.159 30013/32,844 10
Rushcliffe 002C -1.678 32169/32,844 10

Crime Deprivation in Bingham East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indictor of how likely you are to be a victim of personal and material crime in Bingham East. In policing statistics, this is known as 'street level crime' and includes offences such as robbery, burglary and other personal violent crime.
LSOA Name Crime Score Crime Rank (England) Crime Decile
Rushcliffe 002B -0.741 26691/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002C -0.757 26855/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002A -0.774 27046/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002F -0.831 27600/32,844 9

There were 38 street level crime incidents in the Policing neighbourhood that covers Bingham East in February 2024

Barriers to Housing and Services in Bingham East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLiveHere rating measures the financial accessibility and physical accessibility to housing and local services in Bingham East. I bad rating in an urban area indicates how unaffordable the housing could be. A bad rating in a rural area is an indicator of the absense of local services.
LSOA Name Barriers Score Barriers Rank (England) Barriers Decile
Rushcliffe 002A 15.286 22642/32,844 7
Rushcliffe 002C 10.942 27692/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002F 10.878 27763/32,844 9
Rushcliffe 002B 2.444 32696/32,844 10

Inside Environment Deprivation in Bingham East

2
Very Good
iLivehere Rating 2/10
This iLivehHere rating is an indicator of the quality of housing in Bingham East. A bad rating in an equally income deprived ward, could be because of poorly maintained rented accomodation. A bad rating in a non income deprived area, could be because the small size of housing in relation to costs.
LSOA Name Inside Score Inside Rank (England) Inside Decile
Rushcliffe 002B -0.447 23206/32,844 8
Rushcliffe 002F -0.539 24398/32,844 8
Rushcliffe 002A -1.085 29638/32,844 10
Rushcliffe 002C -1.626 31904/32,844 10

Outside Environment Deprivation in Bingham East

3
Good
iLivehere Rating 3/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what the outdoors environment is like in Bingham East. The IMD domains measure the air quality and the rate of road traffic accidents in each LSOA.
LSOA Name Outside Score Outside (England) Outside Decile
Rushcliffe 002A -0.339 21005/32,844 7
Rushcliffe 002F -0.385 21800/32,844 7
Rushcliffe 002C -0.423 22373/32,844 7
Rushcliffe 002B -0.488 23313/32,844 8

Disclaimer: Although every care has been taken to make sure there are no mistakes in the data presented on this page, you should verify these figures with the official data source.